During a recent visit to London, after a refreshing shave at Trumper at Duke of York Street (just off Jermyn Street), I headed over to James J. Fox tobacco shop. Walking into the store, one is immersed in a world of tobacco and all of their wonderful scents and fragrances. The company has been in business for over two-hundred-seventy years and offers tobacco, pipes, cigars, and accruements which help to create a wonderful world of flavor, smells and the mood for quiet reflection and congenial company. Included in the shop are records and letters from British and international statesmen, stars, captains of industry, academics, and others. It is great fun to read a note from Winston Churchill when he is ordering a box of cigars for a male relative who has reached his majority. Churchill makes it truly clear that the selection of the cigar is in the hands of the store, that the cigars should be of excellent quality but not as good as those smoked by the great man himself!I can certainly understand that as Cuban cigars start at about 30 Pounds (about $36) each and run at least 50 Pounds (about $60) at any of the better cigar shops. I had previously enjoyed fine cigars at The Ritz Cigar Room and the cigar room at the Connaught Hotel, but I was not in the mood to pay the extra for the welcoming atmosphere this visit so I decided to confine my cigar smoking to other venues.

Buying Cuban cigars is not the same as it once was as the quality of the leaf has suffered decades of Communist misrule. The funds for fertilizer are not as ready as before the revolution and consequently much of the soil is played out. There are brands that still producjjj e a quality product, but they are not always available. On this trip I purchased a number of Cuban cigars as one of the treats of visiting London in the colder weather is to wander the streets in Mayfair (or other better districts), admiring the beautiful architecture while smoking a fine cigar. On this visit I purchased Hoyo de Monterrey Epicure #2 and Bolivar robusto. Hoyo has been a favorite of mine for decades and Bolivar offers solid smoke. The unfortunate thing is that despite declining quality, Cuba cigars still fetch a top price not made any friendlier by the tax man who believes anyone who smokes is a major Capitalist. After making the purchase I decided to save the purchases for when I reached home; there I can cure the cigars and save them as a reward for a deal done, a birthday or other special event. Plus, I knew I would be visiting the Duty-Free Shop at Heathrow, and they carried a suitable selection of both Cuban and non-Cuban cigars.

True to history, I visited the Duty-Free shop at Heathrow and found that as before the savings on Cuban cigars was minimal compared to the price in the city. I did fine however, that another favorite cigar brand of mine did offer a price advantage. I do enjoy some of the Davidoff cigars, especially the Escurio the Nicaragua Robusto. I normally would not pay the premium on these cigars as again, when I have them, they are reserved for “special” events. I found however, that there was about a twenty-percent break on the prices, so I was happy to scoop up a several of these fine cigars.

Th Escurio is a darker, richer cigar than many in the Davidoff line. It is well constructed, smooth on the draw and a bit stronger-but not as strong as a Maduro but a tad stronger than the Nicaragua rubusto. Sitting and reading while enjoying either cigar with a nice cognac at hand is a pleasant way to escape the silliness of the world. Especially when you have saved a few dollars on the purchase of the cigar! Enjoy.

It has been about a year and a half since I last visited London and from the news I have seen here in the States, I wanted to see what the mood in the city regarding their politics was, economy, immigration, etc. While having breakfast I was able to read several British papers and what particularly struck me were the first pages of The Daily Mail (12/19/2025), which has the highest circulation but is not considered to be on par with the Times of London (which is further to the Left in its reporting). So let me present three stories which I believe indicate where the U.K. is at currently:

1. Phillipson blocks safe spaces for women: Bridget Phillipson is the Women and Equalities Secretary (a position specifically aimed at protecting Women and bettering their lot).  In response to the recent decision by the High Court, she has released a statement that their recent ruling is “trans-exclusive” and refuses to release (enforce) them after the court ruling three months ago. The guideline was created after the British Supreme Court ruled that banned “transgender women-biological males-from women’s lavatories.  According to Ms. Phillipson, the court ruling would ban women from taking their infant sons into changing rooms and pools. She has already missed the deadline for presenting guidelines to Parliament. Apparently “woke” is alive and well in the U.K. and is defiance of the law of the land. Here is the woman who is charged with protecting women and she refuses to enforce the law which specifically protects women. Your government at work for your benefit?
2. British boys don’t need misogyny lessons-migrants do: The Labour government has decided that British school boys need to be taught about misogyny in response to a dramatic increase of violence against women. The goal is to reduce sexual violence by half within a decade.  The leader of the Conservative party, Kemi Badenoch has said that “if you tell boys that they are the problem, you don’t create respect, you create resentment, you create backlash…”. The current effort by Labour seems to have been based on a BBC TV drama Adolescence which tells the story of a 13-year-old-boy who was arrested on suspicion of murdering a female classmate. Ms. Badenoch has urged the Labour government to publish data on the nationality and immigration status of sexual offenders, which the government has refused to do. It is interesting that the “sexual grooming” which has plagued the U.K. for more than ten years and resulted in tens of thousands of female victims was due to be discussed openly in Parliament, but at the last moment the Labour government cancelled the discussion as it might upset Pakistani voters. Your government at work, protecting it’s citizens?
3. The Cost of Welfare: Projections are that one in eight Brits will be claiming disability benefits by 2030, up from the current one in ten. At the same time, new guidelines mean that by 2030, four million Brits will be on disability with absolutely no need to look for work or prove their sickness continues. The government claims that they are working on reforms which will save about two billion pounds (about $2.7 billion) in the next four years (hardly a brilliant success). This “savings” is part of the total cost of over one-hundred-ninety billion currently.

Those three stories from one day’s news show a nation with major problems. OK, every country has its’ problems and, on the whole, the attitude in Mayfair and the money sections of the city was positive.  It was great seeing and feeling the power that some of the young Brits had as they hit the pubs after work.  They were positive and you could feel their excitement.  Fantastic! On the other hand, from the taxi drivers to bar tenders to some everyday Brits, there were more cautious comments, ranging from “we are broke” to” there is no money”, to complaints of their National Health Service (need a cancer consultation? You get a lottery ticket-not kidding- and then the NHS tells you when your consultation will be; one person got a phone consultation in thirteen months’ time). Then there is the underlying problem of the migrants.  A local council was upset as a local building was being refurbished to house five-hundred immigrants, which was more than lived in the village. That same day over five hundred immigrants were caught coming over from France. The immigrants are coming faster than the government can build houses for them, when there is a housing shortage already for native Brits.

I have to admit, I love the U.K. and I am aware of how much has changed over the thirty plus years that I have been visiting.  Gone are the carts selling fruits having been replaced by falafel stands.  And East London?  It is a different country all together, and only time will tell what will happen. London is no different than any U.S. city; it is still safe unless you wander into a section that you know if trouble. Added to this is the current policy under the Labour government of thought control such as arresting an individual for silently praying in a public space, or the seventy-year-old Grandmother who was arrested for criticizing the local government on Facebook.  There is a feeling of national malaise in the air and the current government is holding on with every tool at it’s disposal.

The changes are plain to see and like the rest of Western Europe, the British government is stuck in doing the same things which have failed, hoping for a different result. Fortunately, at least the government is not locking up or shutting out rival political parties as we have seen in the EU.  If the Brits continue down their current failing road, I believe there is little hope for national renewal. It is a shame, as there is so much good to see that that wonderful land.

Not as well known in the U.S. as in the U.K., James Holland only became interested in World War II in 1995 when he saw a Spitfire for the first time. Since then, he has written over a dozen books about World War II (mostly about the western European Theater) as well as a good dozen fictional books. I recently saw him give a talk on one of his works and his enthusiasm for the subject was amazing, but not as amazing as his discussions with actual veterans, their diaries and letters and their families that he interviewed for his books. It is clear that he absorbs his firsthand resources and pours them into his books, making each little story an integral part of the whole.

This is the first of Mr. Holland’s books that I have read, and it is a very heavy book; heavy in the sense that the detail is dense and this can be a challenge for the deletant or novice reader. I do believe, however, that it is worth the effort as one comes to understanding the tactical and strategic side of war, not to mention the other forces that drive the commanders and those at the sharp end of the bayonet. Politics, ego, self-satisfaction revenge, anger and fear, are all found in the many personalities noted in this volume. Generals are disappointed and sacked, enlisted men suffer from lack of food, medical care, proper equipment and munitions and sorrow as they are amazed to survive when they see their best friends vaporized by artillery while just a step away. This excellent treatment of a theater of the war which is often neglected gives those who fought their moment of appreciation.

There were several armies that fought in the campaign: American, British, French, Polish and German. Each faced their own challenges, each had their own advantages. The overwhelming material strength of the Allies determined the outcome of the battles as repeatedly the Germans were a battalion short at a key place or were decimated by the Allied air superiority. As usual, the Germans managed to scrape together ad hoc battle groups made up of survivors of multiple divisions or regiments. Those ad hoc groups punched far beyond their class, and they were a tribute to the methods of the Wehrmacht, but in the end, it was the citizen soldier, the men who came from the farms, factories, small shops, etc. who won the day. Not for glory, but because the job had to be done.

One thing that the author does that puts a real seal of approval on this book for me, is his excellent Postscript. In that section, he provides a scholarly and professional analysis of some of the key commanders, pointing out key errors, assumptions, fears, and egos that impacted the battle. An excellent example is his comments on Field Marshal Albert Kesselring who managed to exit the war with a reputation that glossed over his command participation of various war crimes. Often presented as a Luftwaffe officer who managed to successfully transition to a Wehrmacht combat commander. Holland points out numerous tactical errors committed by Kesselring, his deadly adherence to Hitler’s orders to fight for every meter of ground, wrongful obsession with Allied strategic strategy and failure of any strategic strategy. His arguments are convincing and he offers similar comments on Generals Lucas, Clark, and others.

Warning! If you do enjoy this volume, you may be hooked on moving forward with some of this other dozen or so campaign books, but that is an addiction that anyone interested in good history reading will enjoy!

Much is being made of the Trump administration’s new national security strategy. In the thirty-three-page report, the administration seems to take aim at Europe, which is facing numerous serious challenges.  These include “civilization erasure” from high immigration as well as economic decline and actions by the EU which “undermine political liberty and sovereignty.”  This report echoes comments made by Vice President Vance in March when he spoke before the Munich Security Forum. Additionally, European leaders are criticized for standing in the way of a U.S. brokered end to the Ukraine war while they cannot supply the Ukrainians with the support it needs to continue the war. China and Europe need to “stand on its own feet” while Russia is not seen as a threat.

Controversial stuff to say the least but hardly anything new to anyone who has watched as Western Europe nations enabled little if any economic growth while neglecting their own defense. Additionally their lack of capital all but insures that the explosion in technology (especially AI), will leave Europe in the dust  Finally, unstable governments seem to take aim more at their citizens rights and liberties rather than address the huge welfare cost of millions of migrants who refuse to assimilate and want the goodies of the west but are a net loser to each nation.

Western Europe’s obsession with going “Green” has led to hugely inflated energy prices which in turn has led to a loss in manufacturing jobs and an inability to provide enough energy for the challenges of AI. In the U.K., about fifty percent of the cost of energy is to cover the production and delivery of domestic energy, while the other fifty percent is made up of taxes and levies to cover subsidies for renewables and system upgrades. With waiting times of up to a decade for new, reliable energy, Europe is seriously in danger of being left out of the AI movement. At the same time, much of the EU is still committed to shutting down reliable fossil energy production even though “green” energy continues to increase the cost of energy.

Along with the serious failures of green energy policies, the EU has committed to a five-percent budget for its own defense. The great question is where the Western Europeans plan to get the capital to fulfil their promise? Between the spiraling cost of welfare thanks to illegal immigrants, the lost of manufacturing jobs, ever increasing energy costs, an old and failing infrastructure and a failing public health system, Europe simply does not have enough capital to coverall all of its bases or promises.  German Chancellor has said that the German welfare system must be overhauled, but can it be done against the bureaucrats of the EU who are accountable to no one and who continue to believe in their starry dreams and economic genius?

Trump’s national security strategy may sound rough, but it should not be news to any European leaders. They know full well that they face serious problems but few in the West of Europe seem to be ready to break away from the “business as usual” mentality which has developed since the fall of the Soviet Union. Those few politicians who offer alternative ideas which appeal to a small but growing segment of the population are either outrightly banned from any coalition government, charged with various crimes or face being buried under verbal attacks which all but accuse them of being extremists beyond the pale. Hopefully, the Trump document will make more Western European leaders start to act like leaders and less like the politicians who got their countries into the fine mess they are today.

There is an old stereotype of a typical Southern Senator; he is a bit loose in his dressing, has a southern accent with a definite drawl and a mind like a steel trap. Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana fills the bill perfectly. One of the most enjoyable ways to take a break during the day is to go to You Tube and view him questioning judicial nominees. He shuffles through papers pulling up quotes or writings of the nominees and he has a way of reading them that often makes the nominee look as foolish as possible. Try it.

His writes a book of stories; him growing up in a small village, his first political job, the step-by-step advancement and even the fact that it was only on his third run for the United States Senate that he achieved his goal. Then came the hard part: learning the real job of being a politician when you work in an atmosphere where many of your ninety-nine compatriots each believe that they are the burning bush before Moses. He learns but has a problem in that he, for some strange reason, seems to believe that honesty is the best policy. How quaint!

This short book of just over two hundred pages gives us a glimpse behind the curtain of life in the Senate. In the last chapter, “Speed Round,” he lays out clearly, with facts and logic his core set of political views. Transgenderism and women’s sports, China, crime, the media, and more are covered and it would be such fun to have an individual who disagrees with him, read and answer his beliefs on a one to one, face to face discussion.

This is a quick, easy to read book, but I believe you will come away respecting an individual who may not share your view or ideas of the world; that is if you can put up with honesty.

One of the pleasant things about New Orleans is that you can spend hours in used bookstores, shifting through volumes which reflect the mind set of the locals. I have found a number of gems over the years, and this last trip enabled me to find this excellent volume on RMA (revolutions in military affairs). I have to admit that I had never heard of the book (originally published in 2001 while the volume I found was from its seventh printing in 2008. The last printing was in 2015), but it is a find that I shall keep close. The contributors range from professors of history to the Director of Royal Artillery, British Army. This is short (less than two-hundred pages) but serious book.

According to their thesis, there have been five military revolutions in Western history:

1. The creation of the modern nation state which brought about the discipline of military power.
2. The French Revolution which “merged mass politics and warfare.”
3. The Industrial Revolution which made the nation states to pay, feed, cloth, and arm masses of manpower.
4. The First World War which merged numbers 2 and 3 while “set(ting) the pattern for twentieth-century war, and
5. The Cold War which was cold in the “decisive European and northeast Asian theaters.”

These five RMAs are more important than any momentary tactical advantage (such as the superior use by the Germans of tanks vs. the French use in May 1940). They are more important as they completely change how war is fought across all theaters involved.

Moving into the book, there are separate studies regarding the Western army in seventeenth-century France, the impact of the French Revolution with it dramatic introduction of the mass army, the U.S. Civil war, the Prusso-German RMA of 1840-1871, the Battlefleet revolution of 1885-1914 under the direction of First Sea Lord Jackie Fisher, and of course the First and Second World War.

One might be tempted to ask about the current war in Ukraine and the impact of drones on the battlefield. I believe the authors would not say that drones are a real RMA as they would fall into the category of say, the introduction of the tank in World War I. Yes, they do make an impact, but the initial monopoly by one side was quickly lost and, in many ways, it mirrors the technological battle that was fought during the Battle of the Atlantic.

The writing is decidedly not academic: each section is sharp and well argued with a minimum of excess verbiage. The writing is tight and the average armchair military historian could easily grasp the ideas put forth in each section.

For too long the public school system in the United States has had a virtual monopoly in the education system. Unfortunately, their “product” (educated individuals) does not meet the standard necessary to properly function. Not only can the “product” not read or do math up to minimal standards, the “product” is woefully misinformed about history, civics, and their responsibilities as citizens. In response some states have expanded the use of Charter Schools and home schooling has also begun to grow, spurred on during the pandemic when parents realized what was being taught to their children. The United States spends more per child than any other nation on the earth and gets back the lowest return. We do not have to repeat the dismal figures of failed school districts where a minute percentage of children can read or do math to grade level. Recently the University of California, San Diego has reported that in just five short years, the number of first-year students who need remedial math has increase 30-fold. Whereas in 2020 less than 1% of students needed remedial math, the number has jumped to one in eight. These terrible numbers are not at a day care center, but at a university! How did those students even manage to gain entry? Is there any reason to believe that the students are any better prepared in English or history or any other topic? And I have not even mentioned the damage that has been done by the progressive cause de jour, DEI with its deadly view of the value of the United States.

But all is not lost as there are those who have found a way to use social media as a tool to counter the failure of our public schools. One such option is Prager U, founded by Dennis Prager just a few short years ago. The site offers over 3,500 videos in their digital vault aimed at presenting a well-balanced presentation on topics such as history, religion, government, the workings of government, the economy and more.

The ability to reach out across the airwaves to individuals around the world is amazing.

• 1 in 3 Americans has watched at least one Praeger video.
• Seventy percent of minds are changed on at least one topic after watching.
• Five million views of Prager content every day.
• Twenty-five percent of survey respondents identify as non-conservative.

And they did this without a single cent to taxpayer money.

No matter where you live, no matter is you are liberal, conservative or whatever, a visit to PragerU will be an interesting adventure. We very often exist in a bubble of those who agree and think as we do and PragerU may just expand deflate your bubble. Dare you?

The recent “No Kings” demonstrations have brought to mind the last time a President truly acted like a King, and no, it was not the current occupant of the Oral Office. Rather it was President Biden who exercised the one power that is unrestricted, unpoliced, and total in the hands of the President: the power to pardon.

While all Presidents have this unique power, none in the history of the United States has pardoned his siblings, siblings-in-law, son, twenty-five hundred convicted drug convictions, and unindicted government officials for unmentioned crimes. Additionally, he overrode the federal judicial system, ignored the decisions of juries, and granted clemency to nearly every federal death row inmate. His decision was based on his personal moral view of the death penalty and went against the stated federal law. All of these actions took place just hours before he left office and in spite of a promise not to pardon his own son.

The power to pardon is not limited in the United States to the President; Governors of states also hold such power, but their power is limited by each State’s Constitution. Abuses have occurred, such as Virginia’s Governor Terry McAuliffe. In order in 2016, he allowed by fiat 206,000 convicted felons who had completed their terms to regain the ability to vote, hold public office, serve on a jury and function as a notary. There was moral outrage across the state and the state Supreme Court stated that such a blanket action was beyond the scope of his ability. In the end, the outgoing governor McAuliffe got around the state Supreme Court by issuing “individual grants of clemency.”      Finally, we have the question of should any President have so much power and what are the options for any attempt to limit his pardoning power.

The attached article gives us a fascinating look into the thinking of the Founding Fathers when they gave such unlimited power to the President. Although not in the Constitution, there were discussions as to a recourse should any President abuse his pardon power to such a degree that it went beyond all norms, and that recourse was impeachment. Yet President Biden in issuing his pardons just hours before he left office avoided even a discussion of impeachment. Imagine if a future President should decide to empty all the Federal prisons of their inmates, or “only those inmates who supported his own political party?.”  Given the actions of President Biden, we may all look with trepidation as each future President is about to leave office.

https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/unpardonable

On my posting of September 29, 2025, I reviewed an excellent history of the Russian-Japanese war of 1904-1905. References were made to a tip of the bayonet history by a Japanese Lieutenant who served in that war. Originally published right after the war, it has been out of print for decades, and I have never been able to find a copy. I mentioned that I was interested in that history to a friend of mine and amazingly, he managed to find an excellent facsimile copy of that book reprinted in 2018. Thank you Christian!

The history gives a wonderful insight into the mindset of early Imperial Japan., during the Meiji era (1868-1912). Filled with pride and ego’s that could be easily bruised, Japan had made magnificent advances into a world that prior to 1868, they could little comprehend. Their advances in education, industrialization, the military, not to mention the coming together of a nation that was ruled by power Samurai clans, each having a history to warfare and political intrigue stretching back hundreds of years was amazing.

Like all industrialized nations of that time, they sought to borrow the phrase from Wilhelmian Germany, their “Place in the Sun.”  This was done via military actions in Korea and China where the Japanese military showed exactly how far they had progressed as they were easily victorious against much less Westernized nations. Yet they were also humiliated by the demands of the Western powers (Russian, Great Britain and Germany), who at the peace table, reversed most of Japan’s gains. In fact, the success of Japan caught the attention of Great Britain who suddenly found a new and dangerous player in an area where they were dominant.

Japan was forced to give back some of their gains but was to a degree mollified as a chief protagonist, Imperial Russia also agreed to honor a pull back on their part. Unfortunately, the Czar, not being the brightest of men, decided that it was important that he push the boundaries of the agreements. The Russian leasing of Port Arthur and fortification of the Liaodong Peninsula (which Japan had been forced to give up in the peace treaty), made the Japanese feel betrayed. Russia was also seeking to gain influence Korea which was seen as a direct threat to Japan. In the end, Japan felt betrayed and shown little respect and Japan declared war on Russia. And thus starts the history of this book.

Anyone who has studied history, especially the Second World War in the Pacific, understands that the Japanese soldier was a tough, brutal opponent. Drafted, trained, often abused, and indoctrinated to honor the emperor who was a god on earth, they were lead by an officer corps that had no regard for the Geneva Convention which attempted to temper the worse horrors of war. The Japanese military had an almost medieval mind set but twentieth-century weapons. Take that mind set and amplify it and you will start to realize the mindset of the author who was a field grade officer.

The pages of the book are riddled with proclamations before every action that he, or his commanding officer or his men that they will die in battle in order to fulfill the commands of the emperor. If the individual returns from battle, many have an intense sense of shame, as if their death would have made the battle even more glorious. While the Japanese military machine had progressed far, it was still a young force backed by a nation with limited resources. In spite of their limited resources, especially their manpower (as opposed to the ever-increasing manpower of the Russians), the infantry commanders including the commanding General in charge of operations, used Russian human wave tactics in their attacks. In one attack, the Japanese suffered over 6,000 casualties (which would be like the U.S. losing 45,000 in one battle). Such losses are the basis for the title of the book. Many infantry battles were fought at night, when the Russians used search lights to expose and blind the attacking Japanese who were mercilessly cut down by machine gun fire.

Mentally, each battle or probing attacked was viewed as an individual’s final attack; individuals would expose themselves to fire as they hurled insults at the Russians (who no doubt could not understand a single word) and were instantly cut down. Yet the author, was either a fanatical believer or painted a (to the Japanese of that time) picture of a glorious warrior, the modern-day image of the samurai. In fact, the patriotism, the belief in the beauty of death in battle is so loud, that it is like something a child would think of what war is like. Either a child’s mentality or that of a jihadist.

It is a fascinating book, and there are small glimpses of humanity (a shared water bottle with a dying man who has not only been shot, but run over by horse and iron wheels of their own artillery), but on whole, it is a book from a different age, one which fortunately is largely disparaged today.

A very interesting book that does not focus on the actions of the Indians who served in either the British or Free India movement of Subhas Chandra Bose, but rather on how the war impacted much of India as it was drafted into the struggle first against Germany, then against Japan.  It traces the initial reaction of both the Brits in India who managed for quite a while to maintain their colonial stature and the men from India who “volunteered” for service (some for historical reasons as they were from traditional “warrior” cultures while others enlisted for better food or to protect their families businesses from special war taxes).  As the war progressed and as more of India was mobilized for the effort and especially with the advance of Japanese forces into Burma, food shortages began to appear for a myriad of reasons and a huge migration began as individuals both on a voluntary and on an enforced basis were moved from potential invasion locations.

The book also has an excellent discussion on how the traditional leaders of Indian independence were marginalized after they were arrested and jailed by the British.  While the British thought such an action would calm India, the exact opposite occurred as the younger generation, not policed by the traditional leaders, began a campaign of strikes, marches and violence against the British.

I would have liked to have had move of the movement by Bose covered, but overall this is an excellent book for anyone unfamiliar with the subject and will provide a good basis for future reading.  A major fault lies in the lack of maps as for most people, reading about various Indian provinces and towns will be as confusing as reading about the same in the Ukraine.